I want to build out the first

rhiza: step merge: entered, visit 2
Merged PR #309 at e06c8bf as 2a9cda7.
rhiza: step merge: pass
rhiza: step close-out: entered, visit 1
Removed worktree /home/rhiza/code/rhiza.i-want-to-build-out-the-first.
Rex tab window:01a1acf1-b51e-7929-8737-b7997e4c4263 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acf3-2b0a-7e92-bc08-713246007ed4 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acf4-a12d-7094-94e8-e3cca2ca6b5f was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acf6-8cfa-764c-aae9-f4022df6c108 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acfb-4bca-7e86-94eb-d735bc624402 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acfd-3db0-7c68-9486-1951fa5e58de was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acfe-4955-7d6b-b410-aa59a957d1a6 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1acff-51fa-747f-8a9a-aab97b8c62e6 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1ad01-4328-72b1-bddc-2473d2c3049b was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1ad02-4aa9-7b9b-9463-075042d14516 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1ad03-52ac-7bbf-88af-4d5a8e8d93f0 was already closed.
Rex tab window:01a1ad04-cfca-7d2f-986a-382a39b4769a was already closed.
Deleted branch cs/i-want-to-build-out-the-first.
Deleted origin/cs/i-want-to-build-out-the-first.
Updated main in /home/rhiza/code/rhiza.
rhiza: step close-out: pass
rhiza: run 01M6PF30N2E118RPK0VCHS9JM5 succeeded
Run 01M6PF30N2E118RPK0VCHS9JM5 succeeded

- Workflow: plan
- Change set: 01M6PF31YCJ041HB94MDWQR331: I want to build out the first
- Worktree: /home/rhiza/code/rhiza.i-want-to-build-out-the-first
- Started: 2026-11-05T18:21:16Z

## Steps

- interview (visit 1): pass, then milestone-check, session ea442c0d-1f6e-46a3-908f-01a1acf1a3a2: said done and until held
- milestone-check (visit 1): pass, then review: exit 0
- review (visit 1): pass, then critic, session b6d11c5d-a198-41e9-a48c-01a1acfb3ac5: said done and until held
- critic (visit 1): pass, then check, session 101dc4d9-df8d-42d9-8eaa-01a1acfd2c8b: said done and until held
- check (visit 1): fail, then revise: exit 1
    - f2 contradiction on web-run-log-tail: The log tail 'follows new lines live' and its acceptance reads appended lines 'through the run's log event and fragment', but web-events-stream emits no run-log event (only change set, run journal and inbox events); a driver log growing does not move the journal. The server change set must add a log event, or this leaf must poll. — confirmed: web-run-log-tail's statement and acceptance rely on a run log event, but web-events-stream emits none; a growing driver log does not move the run journal, so the leaf can't follow new lines live as specified.
    - f3 contradiction on web-design-tokens: The statement and the decision web-ui-design-from-claude-design make Claude Design's output the source of the tokens (and the leaf is blocked on claude-design-output), yet the acceptance pins the tokens to the owner's basics' hex values (soil #0D0C09 ... rose #9A4F37). If Claude Design adjusts any colour the check fails a faithful build; the acceptance should compare against the delivered design system's tokens. — confirmed: web-ui-design-from-claude-design makes Claude Design's output the source of the design system, and web-ui-design-basics says it only 'starts from' the basics. The acceptance of web-design-tokens still pins the tokens to the basics' hex values, so a faithful build of an adjusted design would fail it.
    next: rhiza run status 01M6PF30N2E118RPK0VCHS9JM5
- revise (visit 1): pass, then review, session 7d18d384-a17d-4cea-9827-01a1acfe3725: said done and until held
- review (visit 2): pass, then critic, session 25ad2c34-d614-4334-80ae-01a1acff40e3: said done and until held
- critic (visit 2): pass, then check, session e4cc7763-8e88-401c-abd8-01a1ad01327a: said done and until held
- check (visit 2): fail, then revise: exit 1
    - f2 missing-acceptance on web-url-in-daemon-status: The statement shows the URL 'while the daemon serves it', but the acceptance is the daemon-status testscript, where no daemon runs or may bind a socket. Nothing there can be serving, so the check cannot exercise the stated behaviour. The leaf must say what status shows, e.g. the configured URL from settings or the URL the daemon's state file recorded, and the check must assert that. — confirmed: runDaemonStatus reads the lock and the state file; the daemon-status testscript only runs daemon --once, so no daemon is serving when status runs. The statement conditions the URL on 'while the daemon serves it', so the acceptance asserts the URL in a case the statement excludes; the leaf must say whether status shows the configured URL or the one a serving daemon recorded.
    - f3 missing-acceptance on web-serve-loopback: The statement promises that `rhiza daemon set` validates rhiza.web.port (a port number or off) and that a running daemon picks up a change at its next poll. The acceptance covers neither: no invalid value such as 0, 70000 or 'abc' is rejected, and no test shows a changed setting starting, stopping or moving the listener at the next poll. — confirmed: The statement promises rhiza daemon set validates rhiza.web.port and a running daemon picks up a change at its next poll; the acceptance covers only default, changed port, off, the loopback address and the settings listing, with no rejected value and no listener change at the next poll.
    next: rhiza run status 01M6PF30N2E118RPK0VCHS9JM5
- revise (visit 2): pass, then review, session 819c85c2-0877-4cc8-9939-01a1ad023960: said done and until held
- review (visit 3): pass, then critic, session 818c024b-d146-4f53-a31f-01a1ad0341b0: said done and until held
- critic (visit 3): pass, then check, session 9c5d82ad-8c23-458d-8bca-01a1ad04be69: said done and until held
- check (visit 3): pass, then gate: exit 0
- gate (visit 1): pass, then open-pr: exit 0
- open-pr (visit 1): pass, then wait-pr: exit 0
- wait-pr (visit 1): pass, then pr-green: held after 37 checks
- pr-green (visit 1): pass, then rebase: exit 0
- rebase (visit 1): pass, then wait-rebased: exit 0
- wait-rebased (visit 1): pass, then rebased-green: held after 31 checks
- rebased-green (visit 1): pass, then merge: exit 0
- merge (visit 1): fail, then rebase: exit 1
    Not merged: origin/main has moved past PR #309's checked head 3a9628a; rebase and check again.
- rebase (visit 2): pass, then wait-rebased: exit 0
- wait-rebased (visit 2): pass, then rebased-green: held after 30 checks
- rebased-green (visit 2): pass, then merge: exit 0
- merge (visit 2): pass, then close-out: exit 0
- close-out (visit 1): pass, then end: exit 0

## Questions put to the arbiter

- review-01m6pf30-r3-f1 (01M6PGBJM14G29CMMYB19YSYRS): Plan review round 3 left finding f1 (contradiction on web-api-read-only): The acceptance has a test 'walk the api registry asserting every allowlisted operation is a read', but the registry has no read marker. Operation.Write (internal/api/api.go) only records whether an operation appends to the log. daemon.set, daemon.start, render and ship.merge all have Write false yet write config, files or GitHub, so a Write-based assertion would pass for them. The leaf needs to name what makes an operation a read (an explicit allowlist checked against a named set, or a new registry flag) so the check can actually fail. The critic confirmed it: internal/api Operation has no read marker: Write only means 'appends to the log', and daemon.set, daemon.start, render and ship.merge all leave Write false while writing git config, files or GitHub. The acceptance's 'every allowlisted operation is a read' has no defined test, so a Write-based check would pass for those writes; the leaf must name what makes an operation a read. How should it be settled? — open

## Review rounds

- Round 1: 4 findings, 3 confirmed
  - f1 contradiction on web-overview-live: The Overview daemon section re-renders 'on status changes', but web-events-stream (server change set 01M6PFE) names only change set moves/lands, run journal moves and inbox arrivals/departures; no daemon-status event exists, so the daemon section (paused, slots, health) can never go live as stated. Either the stream gains a daemon status/health event or this leaf drops that claim. — confirmed: web-events-stream names only change set moved/landed, run journal moved and inbox arrived/left events; no daemon status or health event exists, so the daemon section of web-overview-live cannot re-render 'on status changes' as stated.
  - f2 contradiction on web-run-log-tail: The log tail 'follows new lines live' and its acceptance reads appended lines 'through the run's log event and fragment', but web-events-stream emits no run-log event (only change set, run journal and inbox events); a driver log growing does not move the journal. The server change set must add a log event, or this leaf must poll. — confirmed: web-run-log-tail's statement and acceptance rely on a run log event, but web-events-stream emits none; a growing driver log does not move the run journal, so the leaf can't follow new lines live as specified.
  - f3 contradiction on web-design-tokens: The statement and the decision web-ui-design-from-claude-design make Claude Design's output the source of the tokens (and the leaf is blocked on claude-design-output), yet the acceptance pins the tokens to the owner's basics' hex values (soil #0D0C09 ... rose #9A4F37). If Claude Design adjusts any colour the check fails a faithful build; the acceptance should compare against the delivered design system's tokens. — confirmed: web-ui-design-from-claude-design makes Claude Design's output the source of the design system, and web-ui-design-basics says it only 'starts from' the basics. The acceptance of web-design-tokens still pins the tokens to the basics' hex values, so a faithful build of an adjusted design would fail it.
  - f4 contradiction on web-fonts-embedded: The design system change set 01M6PFF has no depends-on on the server change set 01M6PFE, yet its leaves need the server's work: web-fonts-embedded's acceptance GETs fonts 'from the handler' under /static/ and web-design-components renders the layout through the embedded templates that web-templates-embedded introduces. Built first (it may be, nothing orders it), neither check can run. Add 01M6PFF depends-on 01M6PFE (consistent with the owner's ruling that the server does not depend on the design). — dropped: The premise is false: the change set log holds link 01M6PFFWK11Y9J5WHGP9VM37S5, 01M6PFFFZNADHH2WGMB5MES8QT (design system) depends-on 01M6PFEXSHWC6TR4F3GFKHV09R (server), created in op 01M6PFFWK9JYBJXMVGYZ265VRC and never retired.
- Round 2: 3 findings, 3 confirmed
  - f1 contradiction on web-serve-loopback: The web UI is on by default at 127.0.0.1:7787 whenever the daemon runs, but existing testscripts (daemon-status, daemon-picks, daemon-pause, daemon-headless-runs and others) run `rhiza daemon --once`. After this leaf those scripts would bind a socket, and parallel scripts would race for port 7787. That contradicts m28-still-healthy and CLAUDE.md ('Nothing binds a unix socket in the default test run' / 'the default test run binds no socket'). No leaf says how --once or the test environment avoids serving, e.g. by skipping the listener under --once or RHIZA_TEST_NOW, or by binding only in the long-running loop. — confirmed: web-serve-loopback turns the listener on at 7787 by default, and testscripts already run the long-running daemon (daemon-lock.txtar twice at once, hook-commands.txtar, daemon-version-in-health.txtar), plus many run --once. The acceptance's 'binding no socket in the default test run' covers only the leaf's own unit tests; no leaf says how --once or the test environment keeps those scripts from binding (and racing for) the port, contradicting CLAUDE.md and m28-still-healthy.
  - f2 missing-acceptance on web-url-in-daemon-status: The statement shows the URL 'while the daemon serves it', but the acceptance is the daemon-status testscript, where no daemon runs or may bind a socket. Nothing there can be serving, so the check cannot exercise the stated behaviour. The leaf must say what status shows, e.g. the configured URL from settings or the URL the daemon's state file recorded, and the check must assert that. — confirmed: runDaemonStatus reads the lock and the state file; the daemon-status testscript only runs daemon --once, so no daemon is serving when status runs. The statement conditions the URL on 'while the daemon serves it', so the acceptance asserts the URL in a case the statement excludes; the leaf must say whether status shows the configured URL or the one a serving daemon recorded.
  - f3 missing-acceptance on web-serve-loopback: The statement promises that `rhiza daemon set` validates rhiza.web.port (a port number or off) and that a running daemon picks up a change at its next poll. The acceptance covers neither: no invalid value such as 0, 70000 or 'abc' is rejected, and no test shows a changed setting starting, stopping or moving the listener at the next poll. — confirmed: The statement promises rhiza daemon set validates rhiza.web.port and a running daemon picks up a change at its next poll; the acceptance covers only default, changed port, off, the loopback address and the settings listing, with no rejected value and no listener change at the next poll.
- Round 3: 2 findings, 1 confirmed
  - f1 contradiction on web-api-read-only: The acceptance has a test 'walk the api registry asserting every allowlisted operation is a read', but the registry has no read marker. Operation.Write (internal/api/api.go) only records whether an operation appends to the log. daemon.set, daemon.start, render and ship.merge all have Write false yet write config, files or GitHub, so a Write-based assertion would pass for them. The leaf needs to name what makes an operation a read (an explicit allowlist checked against a named set, or a new registry flag) so the check can actually fail. — confirmed: internal/api Operation has no read marker: Write only means 'appends to the log', and daemon.set, daemon.start, render and ship.merge all leave Write false while writing git config, files or GitHub. The acceptance's 'every allowlisted operation is a read' has no defined test, so a Write-based check would pass for those writes; the leaf must name what makes an operation a read.
  - f2 missing-provenance on web-serve-loopback: The owner picked several choices from the agent's options: port 7787, on by default on 127.0.0.1, server-sent events, Go html/template with no build step, and fonts embedded in the binary. These appear only in the web-ui-milestone-interview Source's quotes. No Decision records them. The server and design leaves cite web-ui-in-daemon-read-only as decided-by, but that Decision's quote covers none of these choices, so it cannot be their provenance. They need their own Decision(s) with the accepted-pick wording, derived-from the Source. — dropped: The premise is false: the run's capture landed record 01M6PFNG0D1E75EJ54R8907ZWH holds Decisions answer-ea442c0d-1..9 for every listed pick (Go templates, internal/api read ops, server-sent events, on by default on 127.0.0.1, port 7787, fonts embedded), each with the accepted-pick wording and derived-from web-ui-milestone-interview. The planner guide says the planner writes no Decision for a plain owner pick, so no provenance is missing.

## Sessions

- interview, session ea442c0d-1f6e-46a3-908f-01a1acf1a3a2: tokens input 74, output 30534, cache creation 87131, cache read 3005661; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- advisor, session 807146cb-6def-435b-a9f3-01a1acf319b3: tokens input 18, output 2193, cache creation 26085, cache read 423281; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- advisor, session 12447f46-0263-4576-b73b-01a1acf48fcc: tokens input 24, output 3422, cache creation 30405, cache read 608683; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- advisor, session 85e85c9f-c743-44b1-a8ee-01a1acf67ba5: tokens input 12, output 1327, cache creation 21812, cache read 267286; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- review, session b6d11c5d-a198-41e9-a48c-01a1acfb3ac5: tokens input 24, output 5190, cache creation 40985, cache read 683166; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- critic, session 101dc4d9-df8d-42d9-8eaa-01a1acfd2c8b: tokens input 28, output 4171, cache creation 35704, cache read 763911; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- revise, session 7d18d384-a17d-4cea-9827-01a1acfe3725: tokens input 22, output 2943, cache creation 31965, cache read 578598; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- review, session 25ad2c34-d614-4334-80ae-01a1acff40e3: tokens input 24, output 6091, cache creation 52771, cache read 781711; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- critic, session e4cc7763-8e88-401c-abd8-01a1ad01327a: tokens input 24, output 4095, cache creation 37808, cache read 666116; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- revise, session 819c85c2-0877-4cc8-9939-01a1ad023960: tokens input 28, output 4952, cache creation 39526, cache read 809894; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- review, session 818c024b-d146-4f53-a31f-01a1ad0341b0: tokens input 20, output 4946, cache creation 49012, cache read 623953; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0
- critic, session 9c5d82ad-8c23-458d-8bca-01a1ad04be69: tokens input 32, output 3874, cache creation 34938, cache read 864268; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0

Totals: tokens input 330, output 73738, cache creation 488142, cache read 10076528; helper tokens input 0, output 0, cache creation 0, cache read 0